Supermarket CampaignWheat WatchCrop PreventionShoppers GuideGet ActiveCommunity CenterResourcesAbout Us
spacer

Pharm Crops > VICTORY! Pharm Rice in California Denied!

VICTORY! California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) rejects emergency protocol for Ventria BioScience’s proposed commercial pharmaceutical rice production in California, USDA denies permit! Decision to go ahead under normal regulatory process.

On March 29th, the California Rice Commission (CRC) gave their approval for the planting and milling of two genetically engineered drug-producing rice varieties spliced with synthetic human genes. This would be the first commercial pharmaceutical food crop in the world.  The CRC recommended that CDFA treat the pharm rice approval under emergency decision-making guidelines, giving the CDFA only 10 days to approve or reject the protocol and NO public comment period.

This "pharm" rice is produced by Ventria Biosciences, a Sacramento-based company. Ventria's rice has been genetically engineered by inserting human genes, and it produces drugs for infant formula and as antibiotic substitutes in poultry feed.

Farmers and consumers across the country were outraged at the process, demanding they allow public comment, all necessary USDA permits, and that the decision not be rushed through as an emergency approval, as the only emergency was that Ventria wanted to plant this spring.

As quoted in a Contra-Costa Times article (By Judy Silber  --  CONTRA COSTA TIMES  --  April 10, 2004): “Responding to objections made in thousands of phone calls, e-mails, faxes and letters, the Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture refused to authorize the planting of two varieties of rice genetically engineered to contain human proteins.”

On April 9th, CDFA denied the emergency request and has sent the pharm rice protocol back to the Rice Commission for further research and review. In their letter, CDFA stated 2 reasons for denial:

First, an emergency approval would have bypassed the usual public review process. But it is clear that the public wanted an opportunity to comment, the letter stated.

Second, the Rice Commission needed to verify that Ventria held all necessary federal permits. As it turns out, Ventria has not yet received permission from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to plant in California this year. The company had originally applied to plant 120 acres in California. The USDA recently denied Ventria’s application. The agency initially denied Ventria's application to grow its crops in this state, citing concerns about the potential for mix-ups between the biotech pharmaceutical rice and commercial varieties. Ventria is asking to plant in 10 Southern California counties away from the main rice-growing region in hopes of allaying these concerns, but the protocol allows for the planting of research crops anywhere in the state and the transportation of milled pharmaceutical rice from the restricted growing area in Southern California to any other region of California, leaving lots of room for contamination.

These rice varieties have not yet received federal approval for marketing as drugs, and have not been approved for human or animal consumption by the Food and Drug Administration. The federal government has not evaluated their safety for humans or the environment, and has set a zero tolerance for pharmaceutical contamination of food crops.

Ventria’s application to plant its pharm rice in California has NOT been denied, only the emergency approval was denied. Now the planting protocol will go back to the Rice Commission for a new recommendation under the normal approval process, which can take up to a year and will include a public comment period. Under this, Ventria will not be able to plant the commercial crop this year.

According to the Contra Costa Times article, Ventria may abandon its attempt to grow in California altogether, stating  “We don't want to lose another year," said Ventria Chief Executive Officer Scott Deeter, “The company will instead consider growing the rice in other states or countries where the regulatory process is less cumbersome.”

It is certainly not over, but we won the first round. Congratulations! Stay tuned for more updates and action alerts on this issue.

 

 

Fact Sheets
Activist Kit
Stickers
Links
Shopping Guide Printable
Shopping Guide to PDA

KEEP US ALIVE
Please donate today
- we rely on each other.


 

 
spacer spacer corner spacer
spacer corner spacer


Sitemap | Frequently Asked Questions | Privacy Policy | Contact Info

Unless otherwise noted all copy, photos, graphics, and other materials © 2003 The True Food Network